THOUGHTS

Aim For Population to be 100% Vaccinated Before Moving to a Full-Swing Endemic Strategy

06/10/2021 09:43 AM
Opinions on topical issues from thought leaders, columnists and editors.
By :
Jamari Mohtar

As of Friday (Oct 1), no states were in Phase 1 of the National Recovery Plan, as all were either in Phase 2, 3 or 4, which means the pre-endemic phase is proceeding well, and it’s a good sign of better things to come.

And when all the states are in Phase 4, the stage will be set for an endemic strategy that will make life and livelihood back to as near as possible a semblance of normalcy as in pre-pandemic times, albeit with the need to co-exist with the virus.

The valuable lesson in inter-state travel learnt from the Sabah state election last year is fully grasped when Langkawi remains the only tourism bubble as a pilot project, and similar plan for Tioman Island and Genting Highlands on Oct 1 being put on hold indefinitely.

This is despite Langkawi’s success for the country’s travel concept when it recorded a total of 9,500 domestic tourist arrivals as of Sept 20 since the travel bubble to the island began on Sept 16. What’s more, as of Sept 30, there was only one positive case recorded among the tourists.

Recovery of the tourism industry

This shows that everyone concerned – from the hotel and tourist operators right up to enforcement officers and the tourists themselves – is taking seriously the crucial need for observing the SOPs associated with the travel bubble. This bodes well for the steady recovery of the tourism industry in Malaysia which is hard-hit by the pandemic.

The Ministry of Tourism, Arts and Culture had previously targeted about 200,000 domestic tourists to visit Langkawi from Sept 16 until December, after the resort island’s tourism industry was reopened under the travel bubble pilot project. It also targeted about 30,000 travellers to visit the island in September alone.

The plan for the reopening of Tioman Island and Genting Highlands was halted following intervention from Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob who declared on Sept 28 that reopening of island resorts and tourism centres or destinations and inter-state travel would only be allowed when the country’s adult population that are fully vaccinated has reached 90%.

Based on the current vaccination rate of 87.6% and figures showing around 150,000 people are receiving their second dose each day, this would mean the two tourist spots are likely to be re-opened in two weeks’ time.

This is indeed a wise move seeing that anywhere in the world whether an endemic strategy or a COVID-zero strategy is pursued, at some point in time after loosening restrictions and opening up the economy when the daily infections are relatively stable, the virus will then return with a vengeance in the form of an exponential increase in daily infection.

The saving grace in this situation is a high vaccination rate where the majority of the exponential increase in daily cases (about 96% to 98%) are the fully vaccinated exhibiting asymptomatic or mild infection. The remaining serious cases requiring hospitalisation and ICU admission, more often than not, comprise those who are not vaccinated.

Here’s the irony of it all: it’s the breakthrough infection – fully vaccinated people being infected – that is causing an exponential increase in daily cases, but these do not require hospitalisation and where it does, lives are not upended. Data in many countries show that the non-vaccinated made up the majority of COVID-19 deaths.

Here’s another irony: as the exponential increase in breakthrough infection does not require hospitalisation, the healthcare system is not overwhelmed, but because it is an exponential increase, there will be a doubling of infections every week or so, and the small number of breakthrough infections that require hospitalisation will balloon which in no time will result in the healthcare system being overwhelmed.

Learning from Singapore’s experience

Nowhere is this exhibited than in Singapore which experts have hailed as a model for countries going the path of an endemic strategy. In May, Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong introduced the government’s plan to 'live with the virus' and transition away from a “COVID-zero” approach.

“Our aim must be to keep the community as a whole safe while accepting that some people may get infected every now and then,” Lee said in May, announcing Singapore would gradually open up internally and then to foreign visitors.

In June and July, Singapore began loosening restrictions for dining establishments, workplaces and entertainment venues. By August many businesses were allowed to operate at or near full capacity.

But then in July and August, cases in Singapore ticked up to over 100 per day after nearly a year of almost no infections due to its previous zero-tolerance policy, which included stay-at-home orders, intensive testing and contact tracing, and a ban on foreign visitors.

By September, cases have risen exponentially – from 180 on Sept 1 to roughly 500 by mid-September and to 2,268 on Sept 29, causing the Singapore government there to announce on Sept 27 the reintroduction of some social-distancing measures, including reducing dining groups from five to two people at restaurants and directing companies to allow employees to work from home.

These measures will be in place for at least a month to prevent the health care system from being overwhelmed and allow the city-state to scale up services to help infected patients recover at home. Currently, 30 people in Singapore require ICU beds due to COVID-19, up from five cases at the start of September.

Since early September, Singapore has opened up 'vaccinated travel lanes,' through which vaccinated travellers from low-risk places like Hong Kong and Germany can enter without quarantine.

The republic had hoped to expand the programme later this year in an effort to fully reopen its border and says those plans are still on track despite the ongoing outbreak.

An important lesson that could be learnt from the Singapore experience is that the current high vaccination rate of 80% of its population fully vaccinated helps in containing the death rate to a manageable proportion, but it does not help in alleviating an exponential increase in daily infections sooner or later down the road after loosening restriction and opening up the economy, albeit gradually.

Perhaps an important question is to ask how high a vaccination rate should be to alleviate the exponential increase? Obviously, as the Singapore experience shows 80% is not high enough, and logically too that when Singapore moved to a pre-endemic phase in June, the vaccination rate then must be lower than 80%.

A move in the right direction

In this context, when PM Ismail Sabri declared that reopening of island resorts and tourism centres or destinations, and inter-state travel would only be allowed when the country’s adult population that are fully vaccinated has reached 90%, this is a move in the right direction.

But again Singapore’s 80% fully vaccinated refers to its population, not just its adult population. So perhaps, the re-opening of island resorts, tourism centres and inter-state travel in Malaysia should wait for the 90% of the population to be fully vaccinated, instead of just our adult population. Or better still, wait for 100% of our population to be fully vaccinated!

However, this comes at a cost of slower growth to the economy. To still continue with 90% of our adult population to be vaccinated for reopening, perhaps another additional variable should be relied on, and this is the infectivity rate, the R number that must be below 1. As of Sept 29, Malaysia’s infectivity rate was at 0.89, compared to Singapore’s above 1.

But above all, as the Langkawi success shows, it is everyone shouldering their personal and social responsibility in observing the SOPs that is key to successful pre-endemic and endemic phases.

-- BERNAMA

Jamari Mohtar is Director, Media & Communications at EMIR Research, a think tank focused on strategic policy recommendations based on rigorous research.

(The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of BERNAMA)